秘书 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 17-27.

• 本期专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

基层治理新“传统”:矛盾解决路径与治理共同体构建——以永康市“一警情三推送”为例

张品  应小丽  叶羽裳   

  1. 浙江师范大学
  • 出版日期:2021-07-15 发布日期:2021-09-02
  • 作者简介:张品,管理学博士,浙江师范大学法政学院讲师,硕士生导师。研究方向:基层社会治理。应小丽,法学博士,浙江师范大学法政学院教授,硕士生导师。研究方向:基层社会治理。叶羽裳,浙江师范大学法政学院行政管理专业硕士研究生。研究方向:基层社会治理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“乡村振兴战略下村庄治理趋同化及治理优化研究”(20CSH051);浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题“国家、市场与乡贤制度的断点续传:制度演化逻辑与乡村振兴”(1NDQN32YB);浙江师范大学自主设计科研课题“浙江基层社会治理经验及其‘重要窗口’效应研究”(2020ZS0202

The New “Tradition” of Grassroots Governance: the Path of Contradiction Resolution and the Construction of Governance Community——A Case Study of “One Alert and Three Push” in Yongkang City

ZHANG Pin   YING Xiaoli   YE Yushang   

  • Online:2021-07-15 Published:2021-09-02

摘要: 近年来浙江省永康市在解决基层纠纷过程中,突破了以往先由基层权威调解,调解不成再报案走行政与司法途径的惯例,转而采用先报案走行政与司法途径,再通过公安部门的精准分析研判,筛选出可由基层调解的纠纷,并将其分发推送至基层政权,由基层权威调解。随着基层自治领域的逐渐缩小,基层权威在调解日常纠纷中不再独立发挥作用,一个新的基层治理共同体逐渐形成。永康市矛盾调解现象背后的基层治理逻辑,既不是传统治理逻辑的延伸,也不是传统治理逻辑的断裂,而是在党领导下形成的基层治理的新“传统”。

关键词: 基层治理新“传统”, 治理共同体, 一警情三推送

Abstract:

In recent years,in the process of resolving grassroots disputesYongkang city of Zhejiang province has broken through the previous practice of using grassroots authority to mediateand reporting the case through administrative and judicial channels after mediation fails. Insteadthey first report the case to the police through administrative and judicial channelsthen screen out the disputes that can be mediated by the grassroots through the accurate analysis and judgment of the public security department, then distribute and push to the grassroots political power for mediation by the grassroots authority. With the gradual shrinking of the field of grassroots autonomygrassroots authority no longer plays an independent role in mediating grassroots disputesand a new community of grassroots governance gradually formed. The grassroots governance logic behind the mediation phenomenon in Yongkang city is neither an extension of the traditional governance logic nor a break of the traditional governance logicbut a new “tradition” of grassroots governance formed under the

leadership of the Communist Party of China.

Key words: new “tradition” of grassroots governance, governance community, one alert and three push