秘书 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 30-41.

• 本期专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

反思与推进:国内社区治理研究的未来走向

聂继凯   

  1. 扬州大学
  • 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-07-07
  • 作者简介:聂继凯,博士,扬州大学马克思主义理论博士后流动站在站博士后,扬州大学公共管理系讲师,扬州大学政府治理与公共政策研究中心研究人员。研究方向:基层治理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金一般项目“协同治理视阈下的农村公共服务供给机制创新研究”(16BZZ056);江苏省博士后科研资助计划课题“社会共治图景下的多元主体互赖模式研究”(1701135C

Reflection and Advancement:The Future Trend of Domestic Community Governance Research

NIE Jikai   

  • Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-07-07

摘要: 基于CSSCICNKI 和文献笔记三个数据库,借助CiteSpace 可视化文献计量软件,综合运用文献计量和质性分析的方法梳理国内社区治理研究成果,获得如下重要发现:形成了社区治理基础理论研究、社区治理主体研究、社区治理城乡二元性研究、社区治理中的公共服务供给研究和社区治理反思研究五个研究领域;研究脉络历经孕育、形成、发展、深度调整四个时期;社区治理结构和社区社会组织既是研究热点,也是研究前沿;现有研究以政治学、社会学和公共管理学为主要学科支撑,学科交叉特征明显;形成了以治理理论、社会资本理论和国家-社会关系理论为核心的三个理论群落;研究方法以单案例质性研究为主。基于上述研究结论得出了三个以反思和推进为核心特征的国内社区治理研究未来走向。

关键词: 社区治理, 文献计量, 知识图谱, 反思, 推进

Abstract:

Based on three databases including CSSCI,CNKI and literature databasecombined with CiteSpace visualization softwareanalyzes these research results of community governance by comprehensively using bibliometrics and qualitative analysis methods, and obtains some important findings as followedhas formed 5 main research fields composed of base researchresidents’ autonomy and participationurban and rural duality research, public service and reflection of community governancethe research evolution has undergone four periods as gestationformationdevelopment and depth adjustmentcommunity governance structure and community social organization are both research hotspots and frontierthe interdisciplinary features obvious and axes are political sciencesociology and public managementhas formed three theoretical communities centered on governance theorysocial capital theory and state-social relations theoryresearch method is mainly based on qualitative research method and empirical analysis relies on single case study excessively. Based on the above research conclusionsthree future trends of domestic community governance research with reflection and advancement as the core characteristics are drawn.

Key words: community governance, bibliometrics, knowledge map, reflection, advancement