秘书 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 56-72.

• 公共管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

“非渐进式”政策执行阻滞何以消解?——基于“决策模糊-执行协商分析框架的多案例研究

万筠,林婧淇   

  1. 山东师范大学
  • 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-01-27
  • 作者简介:万筠,博士,山东师范大学公共管理学院讲师。研究方向:政府运行、公共政策过程、城市治理。林婧淇,山东师范大学公共管理学院学生。研究方向:公共政策、政府运行。

How can the Retardance of“Non-progressive” Policy Implementation be Solved?—A Multiple-Case Study based on the Analysis Framework of“Ambiguous Decision Making-Negotiated Implementation”

WAN Yun,LIN Jingqi   

  • Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-27

摘要:

“非渐进式”政策具有力度大、目标明确、时间紧迫等特点,对其执行阻滞的消解不仅成为基层执行者面对的难题,也是对政策制定者实现既定目标的考验。本研究基于中国政策自上而下推行的背景特征,结合基层在政策细化阶段的模糊程度差异和政策实施阶段的协商程度差异,构建了“决策模糊- 执行协商”分析框架,以“双减”政策在基层的执行情况为分析对象,对全国8省20区县开展三轮跟踪调研和田野观察,在此基础上具体分析四类政策执行阻滞的不同表现及消解思路。本研究认为,政策执行阻滞的消解需要根据不同的阻滞类型及生成机理有针对性地予以应对,尤其要关注政策执行中具有双重身份的基层政府职能部门。根据政策执行阻滞的不同表现和类型差异,基层政府职能部门需要针对性地发挥创新能力、整合能力、激活能力和宏观监管能力。

关键词:

Abstract:

 Due to its strong strength, clear goals,and urgent time requirements,the solution of the“non-progressive” policy is not only a difficult problem faced by the grass-roots implementers,but also a test for the policymakers to achieve the established goals. Based on the top-down institutional background characteristics of Chinese policies,and combined with the difference in the“ambiguity degree” in the policy refinement stage and the“negotiation degree” in the implementation stage,we construct an analytical framework of“Ambiguous Decision Making-Negotiated Implementation”. Then,we take the implementation of the“Double Reduction” policy at the grassroots level as the analysis object,on the basis of three rounds of follow-up research and field observation in 20 districts of 8 provinces,explore four different manifestations and solutions of the retardance problems of policy implementation as well. In this study,it is believed that the solutions need to be targeted according to different types of retardation and the generation mechanism. At the same time,special attention is paid to the role of grassroots governments in the implementation of policies,according to the different performances and types of problems, grassroots governments need to exert their abilities of innovation,integration,activation and macro supervision.

Key words: “non-progressive” policy, the retardance of implementation, “Double Reduction” policy, ambiguous decision making, negotiated implementation