秘书 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 50-64.

• 本期专题2 • 上一篇    下一篇

“专家”如何激活参与式治理?——对X街道“微花园”项目实践的观察

纪岫辰,杨帆   

  • 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-07-15
  • 作者简介:纪岫辰,华东政法大学政府管理学院硕士研究生。研究方向:社区治理、公共服务。杨帆,华东政法大学政府管理学院副教授。研究方向:基层治理与社会动员。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目“基层网格化政策动员机制研究”(72204088)

How Do Experts Activate Participatory Governance—A Case Study of the Micro Garden Project in X Street

JI Xiuchen, YANG Fan   

  • Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-07-15

摘要: 以基层网格为依托,“参与式治理”成为一种具有创新政策动员、塑造治理合法性、提高公共服务质量、强化问责等多重功能的治理理念。然而,针对“谁来参与/要不要参与/怎么参与”等本源性的问题,“参与式治理”无法给出标准答案;面对“表演式参与”与“抗争性参与”等与治理预期相悖的现象,这一理念的倡导者也往往给出同语反复的解释。事实上,参与式治理中存在的沟通和动员困难,通常无法靠政府与民众自行化解。而借助第三方力量重塑治理结构和行动策略,是一种值得期待的思路。A市X街道“微花园”项目引入了由大学教授、专业规划师、社会组织成员组成的社区规划师团队,作为“微花园”项目的第三方力量在实践中起到链接资源、培育能力、促进沟通等作用。基于CLEAR模型,对这一群体在参与渠道、参与动力和参与能力三个维度的行动策略进行分析,可初步提炼“专家”激活参与式治理的实践逻辑,也为社会治理共同体的研究提供新的命题。

关键词: 参与式治理, 专家, 社区规划师

Abstract: In the context of grid management,participatory governance has emerged as a prominent concept with various functions, including policy mobilization, legitimacy maintenance, public service quality improvement, and accountability enhancement. However, this concept falls short in providing comprehensive answers to fundamental questions such as “who participates” “whether to participate”, and “how to participate”. Advocates of participatory governance often provide contradictory explanations when confronted with administrative pathologies such as symbolic and contentious participation. Resolving the inherent challenges of communication and mobilization requires the involvement of third-party forces. One promising approach is the utilization of a loose alliance called the Community Planner Team, consisting of university professors, planners, and members of social organizations in the Micro Garden project in City A’s X Street. Serving as a third party, they facilitate resource connection, capacity building, and communication. By analyzing the strategies employed by this group, we can glean initial insights into expert-activated participation, offer new directions for the study of social governance.

Key words: participatory governance, experts, community planners