上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 29-41.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

迈向中国自主环境法解释学:理念转变与路径选择

  

  1. 上海政法学院 经济法学院
  • 出版日期:2026-07-15 发布日期:2026-08-03
  • 作者简介:
    张翰林,上海政法学院经济法学院讲师,法学博士。主要研究方向:环境法基础理论,环境公益诉讼。
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金重点项目(22AFX023)

    上海市教育发展基金会和上海市教育委员会“晨光计划”项目(25CGA75)

Towards the Conceptual Shift and Realization of an Autonomous Chinese Environmental Legal Hermeneutics

  1. School of Economic Law, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law
  • Online:2026-07-15 Published:2026-08-03

摘要:

随着《中华人民共和国生态环境法典》颁布实施,我国环境法治建设正式迈入法典化时代,环境法学研究重心也随之从立法论转向解释论,环境法解释学的自主建构,成为完善环境法学自主知识体系、保障法典统一正确实施的核心命题。在传统部门法解释范式束缚与西方法理移植路径依赖下,当前环境法解释学存在适配性不足、本土语境契合度不够、体系化解释能力欠缺等现实难题,难以回应中国环境治理的特殊需求。迈向中国自主环境法解释学,核心在于完成理念转变:以习近平法治思想与生态文明思想为指引,立足政党法治制度逻辑与“天人合一”文化根基,确立生态整体主义立场,实现从移植依附到本土内生、从人类中心主义到生态中心主义的范式转型。在此基础上,通过融合解释主义与功能主义方法论、构建“法律—政策—实践”三元互动解释框架、促进多元规范体系融贯协调,完成自主解释学的体系化落地,以契合中国实践的解释方案,提升环境法规范适用效能,为生态文明法治建设提供方法论保障。

关键词:

Abstract:

With the promulgation and implementation of the Ecological and Environmental Code of the People’s Republic of China, the development of China’s environmental rule of law has officially entered the era of codification. The research focus of environmental law has correspondingly shifted from legislative theory to interpretative theory. The independent development of environmental law hermeneutics has become a core proposition for enhancing the autonomous knowledge system of environmental law and ensuring the uniform and accurate implementation of the Code. Constrained by traditional sectoral law interpretative paradigms and a path dependence on transplanting Western legal theories, current environmental law hermeneutics faces practical difficulties—such as insufficient adaptability, inadequate alignment with local contexts, and a lack of systematic interpretative capacity—making it difficult to respond to the specific needs of China’s environmental governance. To address this, the systematic implementation of autonomous hermeneutics is achieved by integrating interpretivist and functionalist methodologies, constructing a trilateral interactive interpretative framework of“law – policy – practice,”and promoting the harmonious coordination of multiple normative systems. This approach enhances the application efficacy of environmental law norms through an interpretative solution tailored to Chinese practice, providing a methodological guarantee for developing the rule of law in ecological civilization.

Key words: autonomous knowledge system: environmental law hermeneutics, conceptual transformation

中图分类号: