上海大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 146-156.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

从“资本霸权”到“劳动本位”:数字劳动分配的正义转向

  

  1. 杭州电子科技大学 马克思主义学院
  • 出版日期:2026-03-15 发布日期:2026-03-17
  • 作者简介:
    彭鸽,杭州电子科技大学马克思主义学院副研究员,哲学博士。研究方向:马克思主义政治经济学。
    王海稳,杭州电子科技大学马克思主义学院研究员,政治学博士。研究方向:马克思主义基本理论。
  • 基金资助:

    浙江省习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心常规课题(24CCG10);

    国家社会科学基金一般项目(21BKS059)

From Capital Hegemony to Labor Ontology: The Just Transition of Digital Labor Distribution

  1. School of Marxism, Hangzhou Dianzi University
  • Online:2026-03-15 Published:2026-03-17

摘要: 当前,劳动形态的数字变革正在重塑全球生产关系的底层逻辑,数字劳动在资本与技术深度耦合中异化为新型权力规训场域。在资本主义生产体系中,智能机器在场的“劳动分配”没落、数字生产资料的霸权垄断、数字资本的野蛮效应和数据要素收益分配的制度性失灵,导致劳资贫富两极分化呈指数级加剧,社会公平正义体系遭遇系统性重创。作为社会主义国家,中国始终将增进劳动的乐生性与目的性、促进全体人民共同富裕确立为分配的正义罗盘,构筑“劳动主导”的人机分配法治框架、明确数字生产资料公有制属性、构建数字资本回应型规制模式以及推进数据要素贡献与数据产权的“劳动赋权”改革,为全球数字经济治理提供统筹公平与效率的制度范式。

关键词:

Abstract: In contemporary society, the digital transformation of labor forms is reshaping the foundationallogic of global production relations. Digital labor, deeply entangled with capital and technology, has becomealienated into a novel regime of power and discipline. Within the capitalist mode of production, the decline oflabor allocation in the presence of intelligent machines, the hegemonic monopolization of digital means ofproduction, the savage effects of digital capital, and the institutional failure of data-factor income distributionhave together led to an exponential exacerbation of polarization between capital and labor, inflicting systemicdamage on frameworks of social fairness and justice. As a socialist country, China has consistently taken the joyand purpose of labor, as well as the advancement of common prosperity for all, as the compass of distributivejustice. By constructing a "labor-led" legal framework for human-machine distribution, clarifying the publicownership attribute of digital means of production, developing a responsive regulatory model for digital capital,and advancing the reforms of "labor empowermen" in the data-factor contribution and data property rights,China offers an institutional paradigm for global digital economic governance that coordinates fairness andefficiency.

Key words:

中图分类号: